There has been a bit of debate as to what a police report saying someone is not guilty of any crime based on the supposed evidence presented means... so let me spell it out for all of you.

Consider everything every YouTuber presented to the public as evidence. Consider the millions of subscribers, the millions of video views, the millions of likes etc. that supported this supposed evidence.

You have a bunch of YouTubers, no college degree, not even a high school diploma required to be a YouTuber. You don't even have to have a fully developed brain to be a YouTuber, that's how bad it is.

So you got these YouTubers, who are saying someone is guilty of som*thing when they have no actual understanding of the law.

the-witness-amp-authorities-side-onision-over-baseless

Onision, myself, said that there was no crime committed by me, but rather a crime committed against me. Who am I? I'm a former US Air Force police officier. Yeah... did the drama channels mention that? No?

And then you have the police, stating there was, based on EVERYTHING the YouTubers presented and the slanderous fake-v****ms presented, the police still concluded THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE CLAIMS

So what does this means? It means people with college degrees, people who are experts in law, looked at all these silly ridiculous YouTuber rumors, and they said: BULLSH***

Your question at this point might be, how does the Anti-Onision (anyone who does not like Onision is Anti-Onision BTW, get that clear) community live with themselves? Let's cover just a few of the things the Anti-Onision community slandered Onision over/accused him of.


The Anti-Onision community falsely accused Onision of:
1. Trafficking human beings.
2. Ending people's lives (not even kidding)
3. Being a criminal of other, too gr*ss to even discuss, means.
4. Being att**cted to disgusting things.
5. Being dishonest about what really happened (turns out, Onision's statements/conclusion matches the police more than anyone, truth wins)
6. Illegal weapons possession? What? (Onision is a registered conscientious objector verified by the US government BUT OK)
7. Abduction (you gotta be joking)
8. Self-termination (yep, people have repeatedly lied saying I off'ed myself or was about to, false again)
9. Slander? (turns out everything I said was true, again, go figure)
10. Being a con artist (to this day, no one conned, can't say the same for what Chris Hansen did to his fans)
Etc etc etc.


 the-witness-amp-authorities-side-onision-over-baseless

So again when you see people say "BUT THIS DOES NOT MEAN HE'S INNOCENT" I think you're missing the point entirely, what it means is, THE ANTI-ONISION COMMUNITY LIED ABOUT ONISION, EVERYTHING THEY PRESENTED WAS NOT ACTUAL EVIDENCE AS CONFIRMED BY SPECIAL INVESTIGATORS OF THE US GOVERNMENT, HOW MORE OFFICIAL DOES IT HAVE TO BE, THAT THE ANTI-ONISION COMMUNITY (anyone who does not like Onision) IS SATURATED WITH COMPLETE AND UTTER FRAUDS?

This is how the law works:
STEP 1. THE POLICE ASSESS THE SITUATION TO DETERMINE IF ANY ACTION IS WARRANTED
STEP 2. IF ACTION IS WARRANTED, THEN YOU EVENTUALLY FIND YOURSELF IN COURT, WHERE SOMEONE DETERMINES YOUR GUILT
STEP 3. IF DETERMINED GUILTY, YOU GET LOCKED UP

Onision (myself) did not even get past STEP 1! What that means is, NOT ONLY was I was determined SO COMPLETELY NOT-GUILTY based on ALL the evidence Anti-Onision creeps threw at the police, but the ANTI-ONISION AGENDA WAS DETERMINED COMPLETELY NON-CREDIBLE, SO NON-CREDIBLE that it wasn't even worth showing to a judge as it would be a waste of time/thrown out. Do you understand now? Absolutely ridiculous.

To be clear, the POLICE determining you are NOT GUILTY/THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SAY YOU ARE GUILTY is INFITELY better than a judge doing it as the case was SO BASELESS that you were not even taken to court!!!

Meanwhile Chris Hansen's ally, who helped Hansen break the law/tresspass, Mike Morse was taken to court for supposedly assaulting women - no one talks about that hmm?


The Anti-O's position was: "Onision belongs in j*il, Onision is a criminal."

Onision's position (mine) was: I did nothing wrong, I am a v****m of someone who admitted to comitting crimes against me both publicly and privately yet I don't go to the police because I'm not malicious, I once cared about them, and I don't want to see them in j*il.

The Police's position: Based on everything we've seen, all the facts/documents prevented, Onision is not guilty of any crime.

In other words:

Police/Onision: Innocent

Anti-O's: Now against the police.

 the-witness-amp-authorities-side-onision-over-baseless

The Anti-Onision community immediately a**acked the police when they did not get the conclusion they wanted - which means their whole illusion of pretending to care about the law, pretending to be on the right side of the law, was yet another Anti-O law. The community does not care about right or wrong, they only care about their egos and their feelings. They are pretty much the greatest example of what selfish, dishonest & dishonorable people are. No integrity or respect for facts.

What happened to the leading Anti-Onision voices? Let's go through it.

Rep*on: Is now accused by a woman, who is afraid to come forward according to Billy The Fridge, of forcing her to sleep with him. Yikes. He's also accused of what he accused Onision of... gr**ming? Wow!

Jaclyn Glenn:  Started her career out by committing plagiarism, one of her initial videos was apparently a complete and utter theft, and she presented the content as her own, meaning Jaclyn Glenn is, another fraud.

Blaire White: Had to publicly apologize for being a slanderer/spreading lies about someone, trying to ruin an innocent person's life, again, fraud.

Billy The Fridge: Publicly apologized to Onision for the damage he did to Onision in response to him going with the Anti-Onision narrative/showing up to Onision's house like a creepy st*lker.

Chris Hansen: A fired reporter, multiple warrants made out for his arrest, the list goes on and on, no credibility, tried to literally promote the sale of a false COVID cure when COVID first came out, yikes.

Steven Asarch: Shortly after writing false statements about Onision for Newsweek, he was fired. He then moved to back the fraudulent documentary with Chris Hansen, two fired/failed reporters.

CreepShow Art: Outed as a psychopath and a st*lker. Outed as dishonest/a fraud.

Social Repose: A serial liar, especially to Jaclyn Glenn, again, yet another Anti-Onision YouTuber who is a total fraud.

It was almost as if I was a magnet for the worst people on Earth to bundle together, like c**kroach bate - so the question is now, are you going to let the c**kroaches contine to spread lies? Or are you going to let the world know who they really are? That they have been slandering me this whole time, as confirmed by the police - nothing they said was credible evidence, nothing they said was valid in the eyes of the law. And you know it's true, because there's literally an official police report backing Onision, and confirming the Anti-Onision community is full of frauds/has been lying this whole time.

Additionally, as many of you are aware, the Anti-Onision community has called the police over 30 times - that's over 30 false reports to the police, and you know what that means? The Anti-Onision community is full of criminals. It's not even an opinion anymore - the Anti-Onision community falsely accused Onision of crimes, to the police, and that in itself, is a crime.

So again, to everyone who is Anti-Onision, you chose the side of the criminals, while pretending to be heroes. 

 the-witness-amp-authorities-side-onision-over-baseless  
the-witness-amp-authorities-side-onision-over-baseless

View the report: onision.net/topic/1796-the-police-confirm-onision-is-not-guilty/